LAUSANNE MODEL: TOWARDS AN AHAM-BASED REFERENCE MODEL FOR ADAPTIVE LEARNING OBJECT SYSTEMS

H. Madhour and M. Wentland Forte

References

  1. [1] T. Mitrovic, Current trends in intelligent educational, availableat http://pipin.tmd.ns.ac.yu/nastava/izlaganja/intelligent-tutors.pdf, 2004.
  2. [2] G.H. Gregory & C. Chapman, Differentiated instructionalstrategies: One size doesn’t fit all (Canada: Corwin Press,2001).
  3. [3] P. Brusilovsky, A framework for intelligent knowledge sequenc-ing and task sequencing, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. IntelligentTutoring Systems, ITS’92, Montreal, Canada, 1992, 499–506.
  4. [4] P. Brusilovsky, Adaptive hypermedia: From intelligent tutoringsystems to Web-based education (Invited talk), Proc. 5thInt. Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2000, Montreal,Canada, 2000.
  5. [5] Y. Shang, H. Shi, & S.S. Chen, An intelligent distributedenvironment for active learning, Proc. of the 10th Int. WorldWide Web Conf. www10, Hong Kong, 2001, 308–315. doi:10.1145/371920.372074
  6. [6] A. Serengul Guven Smith-Atakan, Personal notes on intelli-gent tutoring systems, available at http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/staffpages/serengul/, 1998.
  7. [7] C. Peylo, W. Teiken, C. Rollinger, & H. Gust, Der VC-prolog-tutor: Eine Internet-basierte lernumgebung, K¨unstlicheIntelligenz, 13(4), 1999, 32–35.
  8. [8] A. Mitrovic, An intelligent SQL tutor on the Web, InternationalJournal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2–4), 2003,171–195.
  9. [9] T. Heift & D. Nicholson, Web delivery of adaptive and inter-active language tutoring, International Journal of ArtificialIntelligence in Education, 12 (4), 2001, 310–324.
  10. [10] E. Melis, E. Andr`es, J. B¨udenbender, A. Frishauf, G. Goguadse,P. Libbrecht, M. Pollet, & C. Ullrich, ActiveMath: A web-based learning environment, International Journal of ArtificialIntelligence in Education, 12 (4), 2001, 385–407.
  11. [11] G. Weber & P. Brusilovsky, ELM-ART: An adaptive versatilesystem for Web-based instruction, International Journal ofArtificial Intelligence in Education, 12(4), 2001, 351–384.Available at http://cbl.leeds.ac.uk/ijaied/abstracts/Vol_12/weber.html.
  12. [12] P. Brusilovsky, Methods and techniques of adaptive hyperme-dia, User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 6, 1996,87–129. doi:10.1007/BF00143964
  13. [13] G. Fischer, T. Mastaglio, B. Reeves & J. Rieman, Minimalistexplanations in knowledge-based systems, Proc. 23rd AnnualHawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences, Kailua-Kona, HI, 1990,309–317.
  14. [14] I. Beaumont, User modeling in the interactive anatomy tutoringsystem ANATOMTUTOR, User Models and User AdaptedInteraction, 4 (1), 1994, 21–45. doi:10.1007/BF01142356
  15. [15] M. Gonschorek & C. Herzog, Using hypertext for an adaptivehelpsystem in an intelligent tutoring system, Proc. 7th WorldConf. Artificial Intelligence in Education, Washington, DC,1995, 274–281.
  16. [16] J. Hernandez & J. Noguez, Affective behavior in intelligenttutoring systems for virtual laboratories, Proc. 7th World Conf.Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands,2005, 51–56.
  17. [17] F. Halasz & M. Schwartz, The Dexter hypertext referencemodel, Proc. NIST Hypertext Standardization Workshop,Gaithersburg, 1990, 95–133.
  18. [18] L. Hardman, C. Bulterman, & G. Rossum, The Amsterdamreference model: Adding time and context to the Dexter model,Communications of the ACM, 37(2), 1994, 50–62. doi:10.1145/175235.175239
  19. [19] K. Tochtermann & G. Dittrich, The Dortmund family ofhypermedia systems, Journal of Universal Computer Science,2(1), 1996, 34–56.
  20. [20] P. De Bra, G.J. Houben, & H. Wu, AHAM: A Dexter-based reference model for adaptive hypermedia, Proc. ACMHypertext’99, Darmstadt, 1999, 147–156. doi:10.1145/294469.294508
  21. [21] N. Koch & M. Wirsing, The Munich reference model for adap-tive hypermedia applications, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. AdaptiveHypermedia and Adaptive Web-based systems, Malaga, Spain,2002, 213–222.
  22. [22] H. Wu, G. Houben, & P. De Bra, Authoring support foradaptive hypermeida applications. Proc. of Ed-Media Conf.,1999, 364–369.
  23. [23] M. Wentland, Mod´elisation d’un domaine de connaissance etorientation conceptuelle dans un hypertexte p´edagogique, PhDthesis from University of Lausanne, 1994.
  24. [24] E. Fernandes, H. Madhour, S. Miniaoui, & M. Wentland,Phoenix: An XML based tool for Elearning environment, Proc.EdMedia05, Montr´eal, Canada, 2005, 3439–3446.
  25. [25] M. Svensson, Defining, designing, and evaluating social navi-gation, doctoral thesis, University of Stockholm, 2003.
  26. [26] E. Duval, E. Forte, K. Cardinaels, B. Verhoeven, R. VanDurm, K. Hendrikx, M. Wentland Forte, M. Macowicz, K.Warkentyne, & F. Haenni, The ARIADNE knowledge poolsystem, Communications of the ACM, 44 (5), 2001, 73–78. doi:10.1145/374308.374346
  27. [27] ARIADNE Foundation, available at http://www.ariadne-eu.org, 2006.
  28. [28] IEEE Public And Private Information (PAPI), available atjtc1sc36.org/doc/36N0186.pdf, 2002.
  29. [29] IMS Learner Information Package (LIP), available atwww.imsglobal.org/profiles/index.cfm, 2001.
  30. [30] M. Engelhardt, A. Karpati, T. Rack, I. Schmid, & T.C.Schmidt, Hypermedia learning objects system—On the way toa semantic educational web, Proc. of Interactive Computer-aided Learning, ICL 2003, Maastricht, 2003.
  31. [31] R. Koper, Modeling units of study from a pedagogi-cal perspective—The pedagogical metamodel behind EML,eml.ou.nl/introduction/docs/ped-metamodel.pdf, 2001.
  32. [32] E. Fernandes, H. Madhour, S. Miniaoui, & M. Wentland,Towards a semantic learning model fostering learning objectsreusability, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Human System Learning,ICHSL 2005, Morocco, 2005, 61–78.
  33. [33] M. Wentland Forte, E. McMurray, & F. Simillion, Tools for gen-erating conceptually networked educational hypertext, Proc.of the Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Engineering Education,CAEE’95, Bratislava, Slovakia, 1995.
  34. [34] E. Fernandes, H. Madhour, S. Miniaoui, & M. Wentland,Phoenix tool: A support to Semantic Learning Model, Proc. ofthe Int. Conf. on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT05,Taiwan, 2005, 948–949.168 doi:10.1109/ICALT.2005.220
  35. [35] H. Madhour & M. Wentland Forte, Semantic learning model andeXtended student model: Towards an AHAM-based adaptivesystem, Proc. Of Web Based Education, WBE 2006, PuertoVallarta, Mexico, 2006, 349–354.
  36. [36] S. Messick, Individuality in learning (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976).
  37. [37] D.A. Kolb, Experiential learning (Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1984).
  38. [38] B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl, Item-basedcollaborative filtering recommendation algorithms, Proc. 10thInt. World Wide Web Conf., www10, Hong Kong, 2001.
  39. [39] Geneval, available at http://www.ujfgrenoble.fr/CAFIM/pages/genevalrariadne.html, France.
  40. [40] I. Bratko, PROLOG: Programming for artificial intelligence,(USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1991).
  41. [41] Hansen, Zilberstein, & Danilschenko, Anytime heuristic search:First results, Technical report, Computer Science Department,University of Massachusetts, 1997, 50–97.
  42. [42] H. Madhour, E. Fernandes, & M. Wentland Forte, Learningobject network: Towards a semantic navigation support, Proc.Edmedia 2006 (to be published), 2006.

Important Links:

Go Back