CONCEPTS ON MARKET-ORIENTED TRANSMISSION INVESTMENT

D. Enke, B. Chowdhury, G. Gelles, and K. Stanek

References

  1. [1] J. Nicolaisen, V. Petrov, & L. Tesfatsion, Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing, IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 5, 2001, 504–523. doi:10.1109/4235.956714
  2. [2] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Regional transmission organizations, Order no. 2000, 65 Fed. Reg. 809, 2000.
  3. [3] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Remedying undue discrimination through open access transmission service and standard electricity market design, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 CFR Part 35, Docket No. RM01-212-000, Washington, DC, 2002.
  4. [4] U.S. Department of Energy, National transmission grid study, 2000, available at http://tis.eh.doe.gov/ntgs/reports.html.
  5. [5] C. Mesbah-Bonsu, Teaching deregulation: Panel, Conference Record, IEEE PES Summer Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2002.
  6. [6] F.C. Schweppe, M.C. Caramanis, R.D. Tabors, & R.E. Bohn, Spot pricing of electricity (Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer, 1988).
  7. [7] G. Gross, Tutorial: Role of transmission in electricity markets, Conference Record, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2002.
  8. [8] S. Raikar & M. Ilic, Assessment of transmission congestion for major electricity markets in the US, Conference Record, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Vancouver BC, 2001.
  9. [9] K. David & F. Wen, Transmission planning and investment under competitive electricity market environment, Conference Record, IEEE PES Summer Meeting, Vancouver BC, 2001.
  10. [10] J.B. Bushnell & S.E. Stoft, Electric grid investment under a contract network regime, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 10, 1996, 61–79. doi:10.1007/BF00133358
  11. [11] S. Borenstein, J. Bushnell, & S. Stoft, The competitive effects of transmission capacity in a deregulated electricity industry, 1998; available at http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/Recent_Presentations/recent_present.html.
  12. [12] W.W. Hogan, Market-based transmission investments and competitive electricity markets, 1999, available at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/∼.whogan.cbg.Ksg/.
  13. [13] J.B. Bushnell & S.E. Stoft, Improving private incentives for electric grid investment, Resource and Energy Economics, 19, 1997, 85–108; also available from http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/ucei/bushnell/bushnell.html. doi:10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00003-1
  14. [14] W.W. Hogan, Contract networks for electric power transmission, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 4, 1992, 211–242. doi:10.1007/BF00133621
  15. [15] S.M. Harvey, W.W. Hogan, & S.L. Pope, Transmission capacity reservations and transmission congestion contracts, 1997; available at http://ksghome.harvard.edu/∼.whogan.cbg.Ksg/.
  16. [16] H.-P. Chao & S. Peck, An institutional design of an electricity contract market with central dispatch, Energy Journal, 18, 1997, 85–110.
  17. [17] W.W. Hogan, Electricity market restructuring: Reforms of reforms, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21, 2002, 103–132. doi:10.1023/A:1013682825693
  18. [18] PJM, PJM Manual for fixed transmission rights, manual M-06, 2000; available at www.pjm.com.
  19. [19] H.-P. Chao, S. Peck, S. Oren, & R. Wilson, Flow-based transmission rights and congestion management, Electricity Journal, 2000; available at http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/∼oren/pubs.htm.
  20. [20] S.S. Oren & A.M. Ross, Economic congestion relief across multiple regions requires tradable physical flow-gate rights, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, 17, 2002, 159–165. doi:10.1109/59.982208
  21. [21] N.S. Rau, Transmission congestion and expansion under regional transmission organizations, IEEE Power Engineering Review Letters, 22, 2002, 47–49. doi:10.1109/MPER.2002.1029976
  22. [22] T. Copeland & V. Antikarov, Real options (New York, NY: Texere, 2001).
  23. [23] W. Sharpe, Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk, Journal of Finance, 19, 1964, 425–442. doi:10.2307/2977928
  24. [24] S. Feinstein & D. Lander, A better understanding of why NPV undervalues managerial flexibility, The Engineering Economist, 2, 2002, 418–435. doi:10.1080/00137910208965043
  25. [25] C.S. Park & H. Herath, Exploiting uncertainty: Investment opportunities as real options: A new way of thinking in engineering economics, The Engineering Economist, 45, 2000, 1–36. doi:10.1080/00137910008967534
  26. [26] S. Howell, A. Stark, D. Newton, D. Paxson, M. Cavus, J. Pereira, & K. Patel, Real options (London, Great Britain, UK: Prentice Hall, 2001).
  27. [27] K. Min & C. Wang, Generation planning for interrelated generation units: A real options approach, Conference Record, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, Seattle, WA, 2000.
  28. [28] S. Deng, B. Johnson, & A. Sogomonian, Spark spread options and the valuation of electricity generation assets, Conference Record, 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems, Maui, HI, 1999.
  29. [29] M. Rashidinejad, Y.H. Song, & M.H. Javidi, Option pricing of spinning reserve in a deregulated electricity market, IEEE Power Engineering Review, 20, 2000, 39–40. doi:10.1109/39.850432
  30. [30] K. Ito, On stochastic differential equations, Memoirs, American Mathematical Society, 4, 1951, 1–51.
  31. [31] J. Von Neumann & O. Morgenstern, Theory of games andeconomic behavior (Princeton: Princeton University Press,1944).
  32. [32] L.S. Shapley, The value of an n-person game, in H.W. Kuhn & A.W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953).
  33. [33] G. Owen, Game theory (London, Great Britain, UK: Academic Press, 1995).
  34. [34] Y. Chun, A new axiomatization of the Shapley value, Games and Economic Behavior, 1, 1989, 119–130. doi:10.1016/0899-8256(89)90014-6
  35. [35] M. Klusch & O. Sherhory, Coalition formation among rational agents, Proc. 7th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, MAAAMAW-96,Vol. 1038, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 1996, 204–217.

Important Links:

Go Back